3/24/ · The Rogerian method of argumentation is exactly that. Rather than proving one side is right and the other is wrong, it looks at both sides to see the common ground and reach agreement. A Rogerian argument sounds like a bit of a misnomer - think of it like a negotiation. Sometimes you have to give a little in order to get a blogger.com: Elaine M. Patton 10/1/ · Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic blogger.com by: Rogerian Argument. The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise on a controversial issue. If you are using the Rogerian approach your introduction to the argument should accomplish three objectives: 1. Introduce the author and work. Usually, you will introduce the author and work in the first
Rogerian argument - Wikipedia
We tend to think of arguments as being black and white: either I'm right and you're the rogerian argument, or you're right and I'm wrong. Sometimes, however, arguments can be about finding the middle ground. The Rogerian method of argumentation is exactly that. Rather than proving one side is right and the other is wrong, the rogerian argument, it looks at both sides to see the common ground and reach agreement.
A Rogerian argument sounds like a bit of a misnomer - think of it like a negotiation. Sometimes you have to give a little in order to get a little. Identifying the common ground between opposing sides can sometimes require a lot of analysis into each side. You cannot make a Rogerian argument without thoroughly understanding both sides of the debate.
These types of arguments are useful in situations where both sides of the debate are extremely divisive or hostile to each other. A Rogerian argument is a type of argument in which the author identifies the goals and issues of different sides of a topic, then attempts to identify commonalities which can be used to help both sides reach an agreement. Argument papers tend to want to prove or disprove a point, but Rogerian arguments are a bit different.
Instead of proving the other side wrong, there is a sincere effort to understand where both sides are coming from and attempt to see how they can work together to find a good solution for both.
It is critical in a Rogerian argument to use neutral language and respect the other side's position and portray it accurately See also, the rogerian argument, Logical Fallacies: Strawman. Writing a Rogerian argument requires careful analysis, the rogerian argument, critique, and evaluation of two sides of a debate in order to thoroughly understand the goals and issues of each side, the rogerian argument.
If you are writing a Rogerian argument that is intended to bring two sides together, with you as a sort of neutral party, you must be able to treat both sides with respect and attempt to find commonalities between them. You can also use a Rogerian argument between yourself the author of a paper and your reader. You can assume that your reader believes that cats are better than dogs, and you personally believe that dogs are better than cats.
Rather than starting off an argument paper with, "You're wrong, and here's why" - which will likely alienate your reader! It's just a matter of personality. Dogs are better for some people because Starting with what you have in common, the rogerian argument, rather than why the other side is wrong, can help you to persuade your reader to accept your side of the argument. Finding the common ground isn't always easy; some issues seem very much diametrically opposed to one another.
SIDE A : Homeschooling is better because it allows parents more control over their children's education and allows for more creativity and individualized learning. SIDE B : Traditional schooling is better because it provides a chance for socialization with other children, has stricter standards for evaluation, and provides more structure for learning.
On the surface, these two things are totally opposed to one another. One side thinks that creativity is better and the other thinks structure is better, so how do we find a common ground?
Sometimes it takes thinking outside of the box. In this case, you may argue that both sides value education and want what's best for their children, the rogerian argument, they just have different ways of doing that.
Protecting the environment is important to making sure that we all have adequate resources in the future. If the the rogerian argument is harmed irrevocably, it puts future generations in danger, the rogerian argument. State the problem and how it affects both sides.
It is understandable that many people believe that environmental protections may cause them to lose their jobs the rogerian argument harm their way of living. Acknowledge the other side. Others believe that environmental protections are more important and should be strictly legislated. State the position of your side. Follow us! This work by Lone Star College-University Park Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, the rogerian argument, you may see unexpected results. LSC-University Park Student Learning Resource Center Research Guides Academic Coaching Rhetorical Argument Rogerian Argument Search this Guide Search.
Rhetorical Argument An introduction to the types of rhetorical arguments and related concepts. Introduction Overview Definition Purpose Examples Resources We tend to think of arguments as being black and white: either I'm right and you're wrong, or you're right and I'm wrong.
Rogerian arguments also have a very particular format that is followed. The format of a Rogerian the rogerian argument is also very particular, following these steps: The writer presents a problem.
At this point, the writer should not put their own opinion into the rogerian argument equation. The writer talks about the opposing group's point of view regarding the problem. It is important to note here that the writer is not attempting to prove this side wrong; instead, the writer the rogerian argument making an earnest and sincere effort to understand where the other side is coming from. Then the writer talks the rogerian argument their position on the problem.
Again, this is not an attempt to prove the the rogerian argument side wrong, the rogerian argument, or rebut the other side's arguments, but simply showing where they're coming from. Finally, the fourth step is the closing, the rogerian argument.
The writer here can provide alternative solutions, compromises, or even showing the middle ground and looking for a way to go forward without animosity. Let's take homeschooling. The full format of an argument may be: 1. State the problem and how it affects both sides 2. Acknowledge the other side 3.
State the position of your side 4. Organizing Your Argument A thorough discussion of the Rogerian argument, with infographic and sample paper with commentary on the structure. Rogerian Argument A brief, but clear explanation of the objectives of a Rogerian argument. Report a problem. Subjects: ENGL: EnglishPHIL: PhilosophySPCH: Speech. Tags: argument analysiscreated: epattoncreated: kjordancritiquethe rogerian argument, evaluationlogical fallaciesRhetoric the rogerian argument, rhetoricalrhetorical appealsrogerian argumentstasis theorytoulmin argumentvisual argument.
Traditional Vs Rogerian Argumentation Style
, time: 3:04Rogerian Argument // Purdue Writing Lab
Rogerian Argument. The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise on a controversial issue. If you are using the Rogerian approach your introduction to the argument should accomplish three objectives: 1. Introduce the author and work. Usually, you will introduce the author and work in the first 3/24/ · The Rogerian method of argumentation is exactly that. Rather than proving one side is right and the other is wrong, it looks at both sides to see the common ground and reach agreement. A Rogerian argument sounds like a bit of a misnomer - think of it like a negotiation. Sometimes you have to give a little in order to get a blogger.com: Elaine M. Patton 10/1/ · Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic blogger.com by:
No comments:
Post a Comment